it's a start.trying to involve every language--but, we can never really include every language since some are auditory, some we don't know, etc.very complicated.when we try to represent every language, we make the ones we leave out obvious.that's not a good thing, right?so, complicated.think more about it.good start.love.g.
okay.had a better idea than what i wrote you.it's a good start.and, maybe the way to go.in that, it's almost impossible to say what a thing is in it's entirety--impossible to reach all audiences.so, how about you fix this up?like your psa poster.make the type fit really tight together.then make another poster with a language you left out.can just be that one word on the poster.nicely placed.perfectly set.and another poster with yet another language you left out.perfectly set.nicely placed.maybe three of those.meaning four altogether.does that get the message across?one could be in braille.whadya think?love.g.
Post a Comment
2 comments:
it's a start.
trying to involve every language--
but, we can never really include every language since some are auditory, some we don't know, etc.
very complicated.
when we try to represent every language, we make the ones we leave out obvious.
that's not a good thing, right?
so, complicated.
think more about it.
good start.
love.
g.
okay.
had a better idea than what i wrote you.
it's a good start.
and, maybe the way to go.
in that, it's almost impossible to say what a thing is in it's entirety--
impossible to reach all audiences.
so, how about you fix this up?
like your psa poster.
make the type fit really tight together.
then make another poster with a language you left out.
can just be that one word on the poster.
nicely placed.
perfectly set.
and another poster with yet another language you left out.
perfectly set.
nicely placed.
maybe three of those.
meaning four altogether.
does that get the message across?
one could be in braille.
whadya think?
love.
g.
Post a Comment